Sunday, August 25, 2013

Blurred Lines: The CBS/Time-Warner Fiasco

"Here's the inside scoop on retransmission fees."
All summer long, everybody's been talking about it.  You can't turn your eyes away as the controversy rages:  Is it demeaning to viewers or just reflective of the industry's direction?

Forget Robin Thicke's music video.  I'm talking about CBS vs. Time-Warner.

Having worked for both cable and broadcasters (as have most have you), I don't see this ending well.  Even if it gets resolved on NFL Eve.

If only it were this simple...
I can see both sides in this showdown.  As retransmission rates increase dramatically and subscribers continue to cut the cord (over 300,00 in the past year), TW is drawing a line for itself and other cable systems (as well as satellite).  However, their argument that broadcast stations are available for free is a fallacious one, as this is outside the contract they have with subscribers.

Meanwhile, broadcasters are more connected to their communities, with public service responsibilities and involvement unlike any other local business.  Although advertising is up in the past few years, so are production costs.  And once retrans fees became federally-mandated in 1992 (with new agreements every 3 years!) and became a viable stream of profit, there was no turning back.

What I can't see... is the real end game of both sides.

Is TW really in this to protect subscribers' rates?  Give me a break.  Just like any corporation bordering on a monopoly, their responsibility is to their shareholders.  Period.

Is CBS really in this to ensure viewers get the shows they want?  Hardly.  Otherwise, why would they block access to their website?

So... what does TW really want?  They're not showing their cards, but are certainly in no rush to resolve this mess, no matter how many cancellations their systems absorb.  I suspect there are internal discussions about eliminating broadcast altogether. If broadcast really is too expensive and the halcyon days of cable are long-gone, why not just dump it altogether?

Or is this?

Is this the future of television?

Although they appear similar, broadcasters and cable operators view the world differently.  This time, I'll wager it's going to lead to a fundamental change in the business.  One in which newer delivery systems will be key and both sides will be more profitable.  Movies and series from Netflix, network shows from OTA and Aereo, cable nets from cable, that sort of thing. 

As always, the bottom line is the bottom line.  And there's nothing blurred about that.

-Ed Roth
edrothshow@gmail.com

Subscribe below for e-mail updates

Follow us!

1 comment:

  1. As a broadcast, post production engineer for twenty plus years I feel the need to comment.I used to be proud to say I was part of the broadcast community. No more... A great deal of today's content makes me immediately change the channel or turn off the box completely.When my kids can come in from school and watch homosexual love making on HBO,murder and rape or drug use on any number of channels at 3:00 in the afternoon....something is very wrong. Also, when I do finally find something worth watching, and they go to 10-20 consecutive commercials....I forget what I was actually watching to begin with.
    I realize that networks need to sell advertising,but it just seems that it is about the advertising and not the show. As far as I'm concerned, free broadcast television is worthless. Even local news shows are all about ratings and sensationalism. The time to change has come and gone. Thank god there are still good books to read......Thanks and this is just one mans opinion.

    ReplyDelete